Dec
I thought it showed promise at first. The characters where well acted and motivations and behavior was initially sound and consistent. Not that you end up caring as by the end of the story they have flushed all that away. I felt like the producers were laughing at me after conning me into thinking it was going to be good. Eddie Izzard is actually really good as the opportunistic survivor of a plane crash (we won’t go into the utterly ridiculous method he uses to survive the crash) who rises to power by making good use of his time. He collects guns, supplies and followers while every other sighted person is lamenting what has happened or wandering around with a sad face. He should play bad guys more often. At least they didn’t pick a cast of youngsters to make the story appeal to a younger audience. Which is probably good as it would just meant more pissed off people.
They deviated from Wyndham’s original plot more and more as they went along, until it got to the point the 2nd part of the story just made no sense. The whole we shouldn’t play god morality tale got a bit obvious and repetitive, especially the throw away scenes at the Nunnery. Talking of repetitive there is a series of flashbacks involving a tribal mask. Every 15 minutes we see the flashback with a little more detail each time. Yes we get it the mask is going to turn out to be important quit it with the flashbacks about it. Naturally it does end up being important but not in anyway that you might understand. They drip the Triffid venom through the eye slits in the mask and this makes eyes weep black and tears which has the side effect of making the Triffids ignore humans. What!? Why is that exactly? The protagonist Bill wonders aloud at one point on why the Triffids aim for the eyes but that is all we get. Why does this work? Is it because it changes the shape of the eyes and Triffids no longer recognise them as human? Do Triffids actually really like pandas? Why!? No explanation is given and the main characters happily fuck off to the Isle of Wight to fill a glass lighthouse with coloured sand, or something.
What is it lately with film and TV sacrificing coherent plot for action sequences? Not to mention really hammering home their messages like we are to simple to pick up on subtle parallels or decode metaphors. Am I just getting old a crotchety or am I just way smarter than the average TV/film producer thinks their audience is? Also the book and the original BBC version takes place over months but the events of this story seems to take place over a weekend. Everything is rushed and with Bill at one point seeming to recover from a bullet wound overnight.
They kept the Triffid mostly hidden at first preparing for a big reveal which didn’t happen because instead they just slowly showed us slightly more and more of the plant. Which is good because they looked totally shit and a big reveal would have been unintentionally hilarious. The new Triffids look like a giant Aloe Vera plant with a big purple knob-end on the top and are not at all scary or awe-inspiring. I mean in the 80s the BBC came up with this design:
Sure it takes a few liberties on Wyndham’s descriptions but it does look like a giant, tropical, meat-eating plant. They created those without a massive budget or CGI. For some reason these new modern triffids not only get up and walk they have roots that act like tentacles and allow them access to anywhere and to grab anyone from several metres away. And instead of the creepy and nerve shredding knocking of root on tuber the new Triffids squeak and squawk a whole language. They sound like a mix of Sweep and Joe Pasquallie put through an electronic voice synthesiser like Lilly Allen uses to sing in tune. And now the Triffids eat people with their roots in minutes rather than killing them and then hagging around to eat them slowly as they rot. Just like the modern fast moving Zombies these new Triffids sacrifice ominous presence for new action-friendly abilities.




5 Responses to “The Day of the Triffids Review”
It’s all about the effects and not about the plot – see all the “Avatar will change cinema” hyperbole. No, it will change Michael Bay-style cinema. Plot and character is getting thrown aside for “oooh, shiny!”, lets keep the plebs entertained with a firework show. It’s annoying because at the moment it’s like living in the 80′s where we were all convinced we were going to get nuked at any minute, and all drama was based around that – now it’s Global Warming Climate Change, but where then we got real scary-ass drama like Threads now we get dribbly shite like this!
Also you should be grateful dougray Scott didn’t get the Wolverine gig… he cannot act or emote at all.
Actually it is not so much specifically climate change as it is environmentalism in general. Including be nice to the animals and don’t chop down their habitats as much as it is carbon footprints.
Since you mention the 80s look at Rocky IV (it was on TV last night). Very heavy on the whole cold war symbolism and the triumph of the plucky American against the Russian monster etc, etc. It doesn’t pull its punches on delivering its message yet I have never felt annoyed by it. Not like some modern films which bug me even though I already agree with what they are trying to say. Perhaps that is it, they are preaching to a choir that is already more sophisticated than they realise.
Yeah Dougray Scott being unavailable to be Wolverine was a happy accident. Though he does look like a 100 year old saddlebag.
‘Eddie Izzard is actually really good as the opportunistic survivor’ What? Are you serious? He can’t act for toffee. The BBC has seldom produced such patronising rubbish; truly awful. I just don’t understand how such a great book can be turned into such a mind-numbing, intelligence-insulted, made-for-America piece of nonsense. If anybody has not read the book, but seen this undiluted sewage then I must point out, it’s nothing like the book. John Wyndham books are thought-provoking and visionary. For more info: [LINK DELETED]
When you start your off your comment by aggravating me you make me tetchy. It doesn’t help that your comment sounds like you only read the first paragraph of my post. When I am tetchy and you post with a handle that makes it look like your only posted to promote another site I become disinclined to leave your links intact. I know beats the whole point of the internet but a tetchy Captain Kibble is a petulant and malicious Captain Kibble.
And I have read the book so I don’t need to follow your link.
Leave a Reply